Head-to-Head Analysis

Boneless Skinless Thighs vs Pretzel Crisps Original Organic Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Boneless Skinless Thighs

Boneless Skinless Thighs

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Pretzel Crisps Original Organic Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers

Pretzel Crisps Original Organic Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
152 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
0g
Sugars
7.1g
8.9g
Fat
0g
17g
Protein
10.7g
0.2g
Salt
2.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Boneless Skinless Thighs and Pretzel Crisps Original Organic Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Boneless Skinless Thighs is the clear winner. With 241 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Boneless Skinless Thighs takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Pretzel Crisps Original Organic Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers contains 7.14g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Boneless Skinless Thighs offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Pretzel Crisps Original Organic Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Boneless Skinless Thighs or Pretzel Crisps Original Organic Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers?

Boneless Skinless Thighs appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Boneless Skinless Thighs vegan?

No, Boneless Skinless Thighs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Boneless Skinless Thighs and Pretzel Crisps Original Organic Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers?

There is a difference of 241 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.