Boneless Sliced Classic Ham steak vs Ahold monster trail mix sweet
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Boneless Sliced Classic Ham steak
Ahold monster trail mix sweet
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Boneless Sliced Classic Ham steak and Ahold monster trail mix sweet side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Boneless Sliced Classic Ham steak is the clear winner. With 393 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Boneless Sliced Classic Ham steak takes the lead with only 2.3809523809524g of sugar per 100g, whereas Ahold monster trail mix sweet contains 33.33g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Boneless Sliced Classic Ham steak offers a protein boost with 16.666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Ahold monster trail mix sweet in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Boneless Sliced Classic Ham steak or Ahold monster trail mix sweet?
Boneless Sliced Classic Ham steak appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Boneless Sliced Classic Ham steak vegan?
No, Boneless Sliced Classic Ham steak is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Boneless Sliced Classic Ham steak and Ahold monster trail mix sweet?
There is a difference of 393 calories per 100g between the two products.
