Head-to-Head Analysis

botanical soda vs Almond Malk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of botanical soda

botanical soda

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Almond Malk

Almond Malk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
2.9 kcal
Energy
25 kcal
0.6g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
1.9g
0g
Protein
0.8g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing botanical soda and Almond Malk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, botanical soda is the clear winner. With 22 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: botanical soda or Almond Malk?

It depends on your goals. botanical soda has 2.94 calories, while Almond Malk has 25 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is botanical soda vegan?

No, botanical soda is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between botanical soda and Almond Malk?

There is a difference of 22 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.