Head-to-Head Analysis

Bottom Round Steak vs Newman's own, prunes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Bottom Round Steak

Bottom Round Steak

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Newman's own, prunes

Newman's own, prunes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
194 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
12.3g
Fat
0g
20.3g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bottom Round Steak and Newman's own, prunes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Bottom Round Steak is the more energy-dense option here, packing 194 more calories per 100g than Newman's own, prunes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Bottom Round Steak offers a protein boost with 20.3g per 100g, outperforming Newman's own, prunes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bottom Round Steak or Newman's own, prunes?

It depends on your goals. Bottom Round Steak has 194 calories, while Newman's own, prunes has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Bottom Round Steak vegan?

No, Bottom Round Steak is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bottom Round Steak and Newman's own, prunes?

There is a difference of 194 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.