Head-to-Head Analysis

Bourbon Jerky vs Sabrett, bun size skinless beef frankfurters

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Bourbon Jerky

Bourbon Jerky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sabrett, bun size skinless beef frankfurters

Sabrett, bun size skinless beef frankfurters

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
35.7g
Sugars
0g
3.6g
Fat
28g
35.7g
Protein
12g
4.5g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bourbon Jerky and Sabrett, bun size skinless beef frankfurters side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Bourbon Jerky is the more energy-dense option here, packing 21 more calories per 100g than Sabrett, bun size skinless beef frankfurters. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Bourbon Jerky contains significantly more sugar (35.7g) compared to the milder Sabrett, bun size skinless beef frankfurters (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sabrett, bun size skinless beef frankfurters is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Bourbon Jerky offers a protein boost with 35.7g per 100g, outperforming Sabrett, bun size skinless beef frankfurters in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bourbon Jerky or Sabrett, bun size skinless beef frankfurters?

It depends on your goals. Bourbon Jerky has 321 calories, while Sabrett, bun size skinless beef frankfurters has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Bourbon Jerky vegan?

No, Bourbon Jerky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bourbon Jerky and Sabrett, bun size skinless beef frankfurters?

There is a difference of 21 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.