Head-to-Head Analysis

Bourbon vanilla bean truffle ice cream vs Original Lowfat Yogurt 1.5% Milkfat Vanilla

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Bourbon vanilla bean truffle ice cream

Bourbon vanilla bean truffle ice cream

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original Lowfat Yogurt 1.5% Milkfat Vanilla

Original Lowfat Yogurt 1.5% Milkfat Vanilla

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
340.6 kcal
Energy
93 kcal
0g
Sugars
14.5g
20g
Fat
1.1g
4g
Protein
4.9g
0.2g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bourbon vanilla bean truffle ice cream and Original Lowfat Yogurt 1.5% Milkfat Vanilla side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Bourbon vanilla bean truffle ice cream is the more energy-dense option here, packing 248 more calories per 100g than Original Lowfat Yogurt 1.5% Milkfat Vanilla. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Bourbon vanilla bean truffle ice cream takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original Lowfat Yogurt 1.5% Milkfat Vanilla contains 14.54g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bourbon vanilla bean truffle ice cream or Original Lowfat Yogurt 1.5% Milkfat Vanilla?

It depends on your goals. Bourbon vanilla bean truffle ice cream has 340.6 calories, while Original Lowfat Yogurt 1.5% Milkfat Vanilla has 93 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Bourbon vanilla bean truffle ice cream vegan?

No, Bourbon vanilla bean truffle ice cream is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bourbon vanilla bean truffle ice cream and Original Lowfat Yogurt 1.5% Milkfat Vanilla?

There is a difference of 248 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.