Head-to-Head Analysis

Branding Iron Ranch vs Wheat Thins reduced fat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Branding Iron Ranch

Branding Iron Ranch

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wheat Thins reduced fat

Wheat Thins reduced fat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
248 kcal
Energy
414 kcal
0g
Sugars
13.8g
17.7g
Fat
12.1g
21.2g
Protein
6.9g
0.2g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Branding Iron Ranch and Wheat Thins reduced fat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Branding Iron Ranch is the clear winner. With 166 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Branding Iron Ranch takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wheat Thins reduced fat contains 13.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Branding Iron Ranch offers a protein boost with 21.2g per 100g, outperforming Wheat Thins reduced fat in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Branding Iron Ranch or Wheat Thins reduced fat?

Branding Iron Ranch appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Branding Iron Ranch vegan?

No, Branding Iron Ranch is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Branding Iron Ranch and Wheat Thins reduced fat?

There is a difference of 166 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.