Head-to-Head Analysis

Breakfast Ham slices vs Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Breakfast Ham slices

Breakfast Ham slices

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin

Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107.1 kcal
Energy
143 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
3.6g
Fat
6g
16.1g
Protein
22.6g
2.9g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Breakfast Ham slices and Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Breakfast Ham slices is the clear winner. With 36 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Breakfast Ham slices or Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin?

It depends on your goals. Breakfast Ham slices has 107.14285714286 calories, while Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin has 143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Breakfast Ham slices vegan?

No, Breakfast Ham slices is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Breakfast Ham slices and Sliced Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.