Head-to-Head Analysis

Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG) vs Organics organic reduced fat milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG)

Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG)

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organics organic reduced fat milk

Organics organic reduced fat milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
395 kcal
Energy
50 kcal
0g
Sugars
5g
40g
Fat
2.1g
8g
Protein
3.3g
1.2g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG) and Organics organic reduced fat milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG) is the more energy-dense option here, packing 345 more calories per 100g than Organics organic reduced fat milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG) takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organics organic reduced fat milk contains 5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG) offers a protein boost with 8g per 100g, outperforming Organics organic reduced fat milk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG) or Organics organic reduced fat milk?

It depends on your goals. Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG) has 395 calories, while Organics organic reduced fat milk has 50 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG) vegan?

No, Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Brillat-Savarin affiné (40 % MG) and Organics organic reduced fat milk?

There is a difference of 345 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.