Head-to-Head Analysis

Brim's Fiert Hot Onion Rings vs Chocolate covered peanut butter filled pretzal nuggets

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Brim's Fiert Hot Onion Rings

Brim's Fiert Hot Onion Rings

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chocolate covered peanut butter filled pretzal nuggets

Chocolate covered peanut butter filled pretzal nuggets

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
32.1g
35.7g
Fat
25g
3.6g
Protein
10.7g
3.2g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Brim's Fiert Hot Onion Rings and Chocolate covered peanut butter filled pretzal nuggets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Brim's Fiert Hot Onion Rings is the more energy-dense option here, packing 107 more calories per 100g than Chocolate covered peanut butter filled pretzal nuggets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Brim's Fiert Hot Onion Rings takes the lead with only 3.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chocolate covered peanut butter filled pretzal nuggets contains 32.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Brim's Fiert Hot Onion Rings or Chocolate covered peanut butter filled pretzal nuggets?

It depends on your goals. Brim's Fiert Hot Onion Rings has 571 calories, while Chocolate covered peanut butter filled pretzal nuggets has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Brim's Fiert Hot Onion Rings vegan?

No, Brim's Fiert Hot Onion Rings is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Brim's Fiert Hot Onion Rings and Chocolate covered peanut butter filled pretzal nuggets?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.