Head-to-Head Analysis

British potato, carrot, and Swede mash vs Original instant mashed potatoes, original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of British potato, carrot, and Swede mash

British potato, carrot, and Swede mash

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original instant mashed potatoes, original

Original instant mashed potatoes, original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
72 kcal
Energy
368 kcal
1.9g
Sugars
0g
2.2g
Fat
0g
1g
Protein
5.3g
0.3g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing British potato, carrot, and Swede mash and Original instant mashed potatoes, original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, British potato, carrot, and Swede mash is the clear winner. With 296 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. British potato, carrot, and Swede mash contains significantly more sugar (1.9g) compared to the milder Original instant mashed potatoes, original (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original instant mashed potatoes, original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: British potato, carrot, and Swede mash or Original instant mashed potatoes, original?

It depends on your goals. British potato, carrot, and Swede mash has 72 calories, while Original instant mashed potatoes, original has 368 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is British potato, carrot, and Swede mash vegan?

No, British potato, carrot, and Swede mash is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between British potato, carrot, and Swede mash and Original instant mashed potatoes, original?

There is a difference of 296 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.