Head-to-Head Analysis

Brownie Batter South Block vs Avocado Oil Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Brownie Batter South Block

Brownie Batter South Block

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Avocado Oil Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips

Avocado Oil Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
412 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
17.6g
Sugars
0g
23.5g
Fat
32.1g
11.8g
Protein
10.7g
0.4g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Brownie Batter South Block and Avocado Oil Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Brownie Batter South Block is the clear winner. With 159 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Brownie Batter South Block contains significantly more sugar (17.6g) compared to the milder Avocado Oil Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Avocado Oil Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Brownie Batter South Block or Avocado Oil Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Brownie Batter South Block has 412 calories, while Avocado Oil Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Brownie Batter South Block vegan?

No, Brownie Batter South Block is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Brownie Batter South Block and Avocado Oil Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 159 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.