Head-to-Head Analysis

Brownie thins chocolate mint vs Potato Ridges Tangy Barbeque

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Brownie thins chocolate mint

Brownie thins chocolate mint

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Potato Ridges Tangy Barbeque

Potato Ridges Tangy Barbeque

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
428.6 kcal
Energy
435 kcal
32.1g
Sugars
8.7g
28.6g
Fat
17.4g
14.3g
Protein
4.4g
0.4g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Brownie thins chocolate mint and Potato Ridges Tangy Barbeque side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Brownie thins chocolate mint is the clear winner. With 6 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Brownie thins chocolate mint contains significantly more sugar (32.142857142857g) compared to the milder Potato Ridges Tangy Barbeque (8.7g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Potato Ridges Tangy Barbeque is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Brownie thins chocolate mint offers a protein boost with 14.285714285714g per 100g, outperforming Potato Ridges Tangy Barbeque in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Brownie thins chocolate mint or Potato Ridges Tangy Barbeque?

It depends on your goals. Brownie thins chocolate mint has 428.57142857143 calories, while Potato Ridges Tangy Barbeque has 435 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Brownie thins chocolate mint vegan?

No, Brownie thins chocolate mint is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Brownie thins chocolate mint and Potato Ridges Tangy Barbeque?

There is a difference of 6 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.