Head-to-Head Analysis

Buffalo boneless chicken bites vs Bulgogi Beef Fried Rice with Kimchi

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Buffalo boneless chicken bites

Buffalo boneless chicken bites

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Bulgogi Beef Fried Rice with Kimchi

Bulgogi Beef Fried Rice with Kimchi

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
178.6 kcal
Energy
143 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
2.3g
6g
Fat
4g
13.1g
Protein
4g
1.8g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Buffalo boneless chicken bites and Bulgogi Beef Fried Rice with Kimchi side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Buffalo boneless chicken bites is the more energy-dense option here, packing 36 more calories per 100g than Bulgogi Beef Fried Rice with Kimchi. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Buffalo boneless chicken bites takes the lead with only 1.1905g of sugar per 100g, whereas Bulgogi Beef Fried Rice with Kimchi contains 2.29g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Buffalo boneless chicken bites offers a protein boost with 13.0952g per 100g, outperforming Bulgogi Beef Fried Rice with Kimchi in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Buffalo boneless chicken bites or Bulgogi Beef Fried Rice with Kimchi?

It depends on your goals. Buffalo boneless chicken bites has 178.5714 calories, while Bulgogi Beef Fried Rice with Kimchi has 143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Buffalo boneless chicken bites vegan?

No, Buffalo boneless chicken bites is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Buffalo boneless chicken bites and Bulgogi Beef Fried Rice with Kimchi?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.