Head-to-Head Analysis

Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese vs Classics macaroni & cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese

Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Classics macaroni & cheese

Classics macaroni & cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
450 kcal
Energy
138 kcal
5g
Sugars
1.8g
15g
Fat
6.2g
42g
Protein
5.8g
1.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese and Classics macaroni & cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese is the more energy-dense option here, packing 312 more calories per 100g than Classics macaroni & cheese. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Classics macaroni & cheese (1.78g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Classics macaroni & cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese offers a protein boost with 42g per 100g, outperforming Classics macaroni & cheese in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese or Classics macaroni & cheese?

It depends on your goals. Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese has 450 calories, while Classics macaroni & cheese has 138 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese vegan?

No, Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Buffalo chicken & Mac N Cheese and Classics macaroni & cheese?

There is a difference of 312 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.