Head-to-Head Analysis

Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage vs Potato Chips Sea Salt & Vinegar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage

Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Potato Chips Sea Salt & Vinegar

Potato Chips Sea Salt & Vinegar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
224 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
2g
Sugars
0g
12.2g
Fat
32.1g
22.4g
Protein
7.1g
2.5g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage and Potato Chips Sea Salt & Vinegar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage is the clear winner. With 276 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage contains significantly more sugar (2.04g) compared to the milder Potato Chips Sea Salt & Vinegar (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Potato Chips Sea Salt & Vinegar is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage offers a protein boost with 22.4g per 100g, outperforming Potato Chips Sea Salt & Vinegar in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage or Potato Chips Sea Salt & Vinegar?

It depends on your goals. Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage has 224 calories, while Potato Chips Sea Salt & Vinegar has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage vegan?

No, Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Buffalo Style Chicken Sausage and Potato Chips Sea Salt & Vinegar?

There is a difference of 276 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.