Head-to-Head Analysis

Buffalo Style Chicken Wrap vs Sweatbearts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Buffalo Style Chicken Wrap

Buffalo Style Chicken Wrap

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweatbearts

Sweatbearts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
385 kcal
0g
Sugars
100g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Buffalo Style Chicken Wrap and Sweatbearts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Buffalo Style Chicken Wrap is the clear winner. With 385 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Buffalo Style Chicken Wrap takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweatbearts contains 100g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Buffalo Style Chicken Wrap or Sweatbearts?

Buffalo Style Chicken Wrap appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Buffalo Style Chicken Wrap vegan?

No, Buffalo Style Chicken Wrap is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Buffalo Style Chicken Wrap and Sweatbearts?

There is a difference of 385 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.