Head-to-Head Analysis

Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken vs All Butter Apricot Shortbread Cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken

Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Package of All Butter Apricot Shortbread Cookies

All Butter Apricot Shortbread Cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
256 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0.9g
Sugars
25g
16.8g
Fat
21.4g
11.5g
Protein
7.1g
1.4g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken and All Butter Apricot Shortbread Cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken is the clear winner. With 244 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken takes the lead with only 0.882g of sugar per 100g, whereas All Butter Apricot Shortbread Cookies contains 25g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken offers a protein boost with 11.5g per 100g, outperforming All Butter Apricot Shortbread Cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken or All Butter Apricot Shortbread Cookies?

Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken vegan?

No, Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Buffalo-Style Mac & Cheese with Chicken and All Butter Apricot Shortbread Cookies?

There is a difference of 244 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.