Head-to-Head Analysis

Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle vs Mint creme fudge covered sandwich cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle

Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Mint creme fudge covered sandwich cookies

Mint creme fudge covered sandwich cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
382 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
2.9g
Sugars
50g
7.4g
Fat
25g
73.5g
Protein
4.2g
1.4g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle and Mint creme fudge covered sandwich cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle is the clear winner. With 118 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle takes the lead with only 2.94g of sugar per 100g, whereas Mint creme fudge covered sandwich cookies contains 50g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle offers a protein boost with 73.5g per 100g, outperforming Mint creme fudge covered sandwich cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle or Mint creme fudge covered sandwich cookies?

Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle vegan?

No, Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bum Itholate Protein - Snickerdoodle and Mint creme fudge covered sandwich cookies?

There is a difference of 118 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.