Head-to-Head Analysis

Bunny Sanck Pack vs Jelly Belly Original Gourmet Jelly Bean

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Bunny Sanck Pack

Bunny Sanck Pack

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Jelly Belly Original Gourmet Jelly Bean

Jelly Belly Original Gourmet Jelly Bean

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
366.7 kcal
32.1g
Sugars
0g
17.9g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
0.9g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bunny Sanck Pack and Jelly Belly Original Gourmet Jelly Bean side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Bunny Sanck Pack is the more energy-dense option here, packing 133 more calories per 100g than Jelly Belly Original Gourmet Jelly Bean. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Bunny Sanck Pack contains significantly more sugar (32.142857142857g) compared to the milder Jelly Belly Original Gourmet Jelly Bean (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Jelly Belly Original Gourmet Jelly Bean is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Bunny Sanck Pack offers a protein boost with 7.1428571428571g per 100g, outperforming Jelly Belly Original Gourmet Jelly Bean in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bunny Sanck Pack or Jelly Belly Original Gourmet Jelly Bean?

It depends on your goals. Bunny Sanck Pack has 500 calories, while Jelly Belly Original Gourmet Jelly Bean has 366.666666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Bunny Sanck Pack vegan?

No, Bunny Sanck Pack is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bunny Sanck Pack and Jelly Belly Original Gourmet Jelly Bean?

There is a difference of 133 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.