Head-to-Head Analysis

Burkes Peanut Butter Swirl Pretzels vs Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Burkes Peanut Butter Swirl Pretzels

Burkes Peanut Butter Swirl Pretzels

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
467 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
70g
Sugars
7.1g
20g
Fat
25g
6.7g
Protein
7.1g
1.2g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Burkes Peanut Butter Swirl Pretzels and Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Burkes Peanut Butter Swirl Pretzels is the clear winner. With 33 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Burkes Peanut Butter Swirl Pretzels contains significantly more sugar (70g) compared to the milder Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips (7.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Burkes Peanut Butter Swirl Pretzels or Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Burkes Peanut Butter Swirl Pretzels has 467 calories, while Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Burkes Peanut Butter Swirl Pretzels vegan?

No, Burkes Peanut Butter Swirl Pretzels is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Burkes Peanut Butter Swirl Pretzels and Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.