Head-to-Head Analysis

Butter chicken - simmer sauce vs Buttermilk Topping & Dressing

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Butter chicken - simmer sauce

Butter chicken - simmer sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Buttermilk Topping & Dressing

Buttermilk Topping & Dressing

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
95.9 kcal
Energy
433.3 kcal
10.7g
Sugars
3.3g
2.6g
Fat
43.3g
3.2g
Protein
0g
1.9g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Butter chicken - simmer sauce and Buttermilk Topping & Dressing side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Butter chicken - simmer sauce is the clear winner. With 337 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Butter chicken - simmer sauce contains significantly more sugar (10.7g) compared to the milder Buttermilk Topping & Dressing (3.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Buttermilk Topping & Dressing is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Butter chicken - simmer sauce offers a protein boost with 3.2g per 100g, outperforming Buttermilk Topping & Dressing in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Butter chicken - simmer sauce or Buttermilk Topping & Dressing?

It depends on your goals. Butter chicken - simmer sauce has 95.9 calories, while Buttermilk Topping & Dressing has 433.33 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Butter chicken - simmer sauce vegan?

No, Butter chicken - simmer sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Butter chicken - simmer sauce and Buttermilk Topping & Dressing?

There is a difference of 337 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.