Butterfinger vs Animal cookies
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Butterfinger
Animal cookies
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Butterfinger and Animal cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Butterfinger is the more energy-dense option here, packing 32 more calories per 100g than Animal cookies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Butterfinger contains significantly more sugar (39g) compared to the milder Animal cookies (26.666666666667g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Animal cookies is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Butterfinger offers a protein boost with 9.29g per 100g, outperforming Animal cookies in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Butterfinger or Animal cookies?
It depends on your goals. Butterfinger has 465 calories, while Animal cookies has 433.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Butterfinger vegan?
No, Butterfinger is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Butterfinger and Animal cookies?
There is a difference of 32 calories per 100g between the two products.
