Butterfinger vs Extra Strong Dark Chocolate 77%
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Butterfinger
Extra Strong Dark Chocolate 77%
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Butterfinger and Extra Strong Dark Chocolate 77% side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Butterfinger is the clear winner. With 68 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Butterfinger contains significantly more sugar (39g) compared to the milder Extra Strong Dark Chocolate 77% (20g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Extra Strong Dark Chocolate 77% is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Butterfinger offers a protein boost with 9.29g per 100g, outperforming Extra Strong Dark Chocolate 77% in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Butterfinger or Extra Strong Dark Chocolate 77%?
It depends on your goals. Butterfinger has 465 calories, while Extra Strong Dark Chocolate 77% has 533 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Butterfinger vegan?
No, Butterfinger is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Butterfinger and Extra Strong Dark Chocolate 77%?
There is a difference of 68 calories per 100g between the two products.
