Head-to-Head Analysis

Butterscotch krimpets cakes total vs Smart Sweets peach rings

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Butterscotch krimpets cakes total

Butterscotch krimpets cakes total

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Smart Sweets peach rings

Smart Sweets peach rings

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
421.1 kcal
Energy
260 kcal
45.6g
Sugars
6g
12.3g
Fat
0g
5.3g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Butterscotch krimpets cakes total and Smart Sweets peach rings side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Butterscotch krimpets cakes total is the more energy-dense option here, packing 161 more calories per 100g than Smart Sweets peach rings. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Butterscotch krimpets cakes total contains significantly more sugar (45.61g) compared to the milder Smart Sweets peach rings (6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Smart Sweets peach rings is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Butterscotch krimpets cakes total offers a protein boost with 5.26g per 100g, outperforming Smart Sweets peach rings in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Butterscotch krimpets cakes total or Smart Sweets peach rings?

It depends on your goals. Butterscotch krimpets cakes total has 421.05 calories, while Smart Sweets peach rings has 260 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Butterscotch krimpets cakes total vegan?

No, Butterscotch krimpets cakes total is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Butterscotch krimpets cakes total and Smart Sweets peach rings?

There is a difference of 161 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.