Head-to-Head Analysis

Butterscotch pudding pie filling mix boxes vs Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Butterscotch pudding pie filling mix boxes

Butterscotch pudding pie filling mix boxes

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel

Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
360 kcal
Energy
270 kcal
72g
Sugars
11g
0g
Fat
12g
0g
Protein
11g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Butterscotch pudding pie filling mix boxes and Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Butterscotch pudding pie filling mix boxes is the more energy-dense option here, packing 90 more calories per 100g than Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Butterscotch pudding pie filling mix boxes contains significantly more sugar (72g) compared to the milder Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel (11g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Butterscotch pudding pie filling mix boxes or Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel?

It depends on your goals. Butterscotch pudding pie filling mix boxes has 360 calories, while Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel has 270 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Butterscotch pudding pie filling mix boxes vegan?

No, Butterscotch pudding pie filling mix boxes is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Butterscotch pudding pie filling mix boxes and Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel?

There is a difference of 90 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.