Cabot vintage white vs Sour Patch Kids Watermelon
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Cabot vintage white
Sour Patch Kids Watermelon
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Cabot vintage white and Sour Patch Kids Watermelon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Cabot vintage white is the more energy-dense option here, packing 18 more calories per 100g than Sour Patch Kids Watermelon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Cabot vintage white takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sour Patch Kids Watermelon contains 78.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Cabot vintage white offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Sour Patch Kids Watermelon in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Cabot vintage white or Sour Patch Kids Watermelon?
It depends on your goals. Cabot vintage white has 392.85714285714 calories, while Sour Patch Kids Watermelon has 375 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Cabot vintage white vegan?
No, Cabot vintage white is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Cabot vintage white and Sour Patch Kids Watermelon?
There is a difference of 18 calories per 100g between the two products.
