Head-to-Head Analysis

calamansi glow cold pressed sugarcane juice vs Crispy Seaweed - Original Flavor

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of calamansi glow cold pressed sugarcane juice

calamansi glow cold pressed sugarcane juice

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Crispy Seaweed - Original Flavor

Crispy Seaweed - Original Flavor

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
16.9 kcal
Energy
625 kcal
3.9g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
56.2g
0.6g
Protein
12.5g
0g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing calamansi glow cold pressed sugarcane juice and Crispy Seaweed - Original Flavor side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, calamansi glow cold pressed sugarcane juice is the clear winner. With 608 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. calamansi glow cold pressed sugarcane juice contains significantly more sugar (3.94g) compared to the milder Crispy Seaweed - Original Flavor (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Crispy Seaweed - Original Flavor is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: calamansi glow cold pressed sugarcane juice or Crispy Seaweed - Original Flavor?

It depends on your goals. calamansi glow cold pressed sugarcane juice has 16.9 calories, while Crispy Seaweed - Original Flavor has 625 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is calamansi glow cold pressed sugarcane juice vegan?

No, calamansi glow cold pressed sugarcane juice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between calamansi glow cold pressed sugarcane juice and Crispy Seaweed - Original Flavor?

There is a difference of 608 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.