Head-to-Head Analysis

California BLT Wrap vs Mint Chocolate Thins

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of California BLT Wrap

California BLT Wrap

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Mint Chocolate Thins

Mint Chocolate Thins

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
207 kcal
Energy
467 kcal
2.7g
Sugars
63.3g
11g
Fat
16.7g
7g
Protein
3.3g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing California BLT Wrap and Mint Chocolate Thins side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, California BLT Wrap is the clear winner. With 260 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, California BLT Wrap takes the lead with only 2.67g of sugar per 100g, whereas Mint Chocolate Thins contains 63.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? California BLT Wrap offers a protein boost with 7g per 100g, outperforming Mint Chocolate Thins in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: California BLT Wrap or Mint Chocolate Thins?

California BLT Wrap appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is California BLT Wrap vegan?

No, California BLT Wrap is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between California BLT Wrap and Mint Chocolate Thins?

There is a difference of 260 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.