Head-to-Head Analysis

California cream cheese roll vs Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of California cream cheese roll

California cream cheese roll

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth

Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
124 kcal
Energy
2 kcal
3.5g
Sugars
0g
4.7g
Fat
0g
4.7g
Protein
0.4g
0.7g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing California cream cheese roll and Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

California cream cheese roll is the more energy-dense option here, packing 122 more calories per 100g than Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. California cream cheese roll contains significantly more sugar (3.53g) compared to the milder Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? California cream cheese roll offers a protein boost with 4.71g per 100g, outperforming Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: California cream cheese roll or Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth?

It depends on your goals. California cream cheese roll has 124 calories, while Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth has 2 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is California cream cheese roll vegan?

No, California cream cheese roll is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between California cream cheese roll and Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth?

There is a difference of 122 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.