Head-to-Head Analysis

California Inspired Avocado Salad With Chicken & Bacon vs Good Vibes Coconut Almond Sunflower Butter

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of California Inspired Avocado Salad With Chicken & Bacon

California Inspired Avocado Salad With Chicken & Bacon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Good Vibes Coconut Almond Sunflower Butter

Good Vibes Coconut Almond Sunflower Butter

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
180 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
2g
Sugars
19.6g
15g
Fat
37g
6g
Protein
26.1g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing California Inspired Avocado Salad With Chicken & Bacon and Good Vibes Coconut Almond Sunflower Butter side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, California Inspired Avocado Salad With Chicken & Bacon is the clear winner. With 320 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, California Inspired Avocado Salad With Chicken & Bacon takes the lead with only 2g of sugar per 100g, whereas Good Vibes Coconut Almond Sunflower Butter contains 19.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: California Inspired Avocado Salad With Chicken & Bacon or Good Vibes Coconut Almond Sunflower Butter?

California Inspired Avocado Salad With Chicken & Bacon appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is California Inspired Avocado Salad With Chicken & Bacon vegan?

No, California Inspired Avocado Salad With Chicken & Bacon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between California Inspired Avocado Salad With Chicken & Bacon and Good Vibes Coconut Almond Sunflower Butter?

There is a difference of 320 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.