Head-to-Head Analysis

California raisins covered in chocolate vs Nature Valley Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of California raisins covered in chocolate

California raisins covered in chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Nature Valley Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut

Nature Valley Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
425 kcal
Energy
471 kcal
62.6g
Sugars
20.6g
17.9g
Fat
23.5g
4.5g
Protein
8.8g
0.1g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing California raisins covered in chocolate and Nature Valley Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, California raisins covered in chocolate is the clear winner. With 46 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. California raisins covered in chocolate contains significantly more sugar (62.64g) compared to the milder Nature Valley Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut (20.6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Nature Valley Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: California raisins covered in chocolate or Nature Valley Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut?

It depends on your goals. California raisins covered in chocolate has 425 calories, while Nature Valley Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut has 471 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is California raisins covered in chocolate vegan?

No, California raisins covered in chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between California raisins covered in chocolate and Nature Valley Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut?

There is a difference of 46 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.