Head-to-Head Analysis

California seedless raisins vs Organic Apple Strawberry Fruit Sauce Crushers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of California seedless raisins

California seedless raisins

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Apple Strawberry Fruit Sauce Crushers

Organic Apple Strawberry Fruit Sauce Crushers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
110 kcal
Energy
55.6 kcal
25g
Sugars
11.1g
0g
Fat
0g
1g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing California seedless raisins and Organic Apple Strawberry Fruit Sauce Crushers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

California seedless raisins is the more energy-dense option here, packing 54 more calories per 100g than Organic Apple Strawberry Fruit Sauce Crushers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. California seedless raisins contains significantly more sugar (25g) compared to the milder Organic Apple Strawberry Fruit Sauce Crushers (11.111111111111g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Apple Strawberry Fruit Sauce Crushers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: California seedless raisins or Organic Apple Strawberry Fruit Sauce Crushers?

It depends on your goals. California seedless raisins has 110 calories, while Organic Apple Strawberry Fruit Sauce Crushers has 55.555555555556 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is California seedless raisins vegan?

No, California seedless raisins is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between California seedless raisins and Organic Apple Strawberry Fruit Sauce Crushers?

There is a difference of 54 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.