Calypso coconut shrimp vs Wild-Caught Cod Fillets
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Calypso coconut shrimp
Wild-Caught Cod Fillets
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Calypso coconut shrimp and Wild-Caught Cod Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Calypso coconut shrimp is the more energy-dense option here, packing 179 more calories per 100g than Wild-Caught Cod Fillets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Calypso coconut shrimp contains significantly more sugar (12.5g) compared to the milder Wild-Caught Cod Fillets (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wild-Caught Cod Fillets is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Calypso coconut shrimp or Wild-Caught Cod Fillets?
It depends on your goals. Calypso coconut shrimp has 258.92857142857 calories, while Wild-Caught Cod Fillets has 79.646017699115 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Calypso coconut shrimp vegan?
No, Calypso coconut shrimp is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Calypso coconut shrimp and Wild-Caught Cod Fillets?
There is a difference of 179 calories per 100g between the two products.
