Head-to-Head Analysis

Campbell's chunky soup beef & barley vs Wild Caught Albacore White Tuna in Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Campbell's chunky soup beef & barley

Campbell's chunky soup beef & barley

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild Caught Albacore White Tuna in Water

Wild Caught Albacore White Tuna in Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
58.2 kcal
Energy
108 kcal
1.7g
Sugars
0g
0.7g
Fat
2g
3.8g
Protein
23g
0.8g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Campbell's chunky soup beef & barley and Wild Caught Albacore White Tuna in Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Campbell's chunky soup beef & barley is the clear winner. With 50 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Campbell's chunky soup beef & barley contains significantly more sugar (1.69g) compared to the milder Wild Caught Albacore White Tuna in Water (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wild Caught Albacore White Tuna in Water is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Campbell's chunky soup beef & barley or Wild Caught Albacore White Tuna in Water?

It depends on your goals. Campbell's chunky soup beef & barley has 58.2 calories, while Wild Caught Albacore White Tuna in Water has 108 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Campbell's chunky soup beef & barley vegan?

No, Campbell's chunky soup beef & barley is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Campbell's chunky soup beef & barley and Wild Caught Albacore White Tuna in Water?

There is a difference of 50 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.