Head-to-Head Analysis

Candy Coated Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds vs Keebler Club & Cheddar Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Candy Coated Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds

Candy Coated Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Keebler Club & Cheddar Crackers

Keebler Club & Cheddar Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
466.7 kcal
Energy
490 kcal
50g
Sugars
13.7g
26.7g
Fat
23.5g
6.7g
Protein
7.8g
0g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Candy Coated Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds and Keebler Club & Cheddar Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Candy Coated Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds is the clear winner. With 23 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Candy Coated Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds contains significantly more sugar (50g) compared to the milder Keebler Club & Cheddar Crackers (13.725490196078g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Keebler Club & Cheddar Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Candy Coated Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds or Keebler Club & Cheddar Crackers?

It depends on your goals. Candy Coated Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds has 466.66666666667 calories, while Keebler Club & Cheddar Crackers has 490 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Candy Coated Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds vegan?

No, Candy Coated Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Candy Coated Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds and Keebler Club & Cheddar Crackers?

There is a difference of 23 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.