Canned mackerel vs Calypso coconut shrimp
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Canned mackerel
Calypso coconut shrimp
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Canned mackerel and Calypso coconut shrimp side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Canned mackerel is the clear winner. With 119 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Canned mackerel takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Calypso coconut shrimp contains 12.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Canned mackerel offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Calypso coconut shrimp in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Canned mackerel or Calypso coconut shrimp?
Canned mackerel appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Canned mackerel vegan?
No, Canned mackerel is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Canned mackerel and Calypso coconut shrimp?
There is a difference of 119 calories per 100g between the two products.
