Head-to-Head Analysis

Cap’n Crunch’s crunch berries vs Organic Soy Unsweetened Non-Dairy Beverage

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cap’n Crunch’s crunch berries

Cap’n Crunch’s crunch berries

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Soy Unsweetened Non-Dairy Beverage

Organic Soy Unsweetened Non-Dairy Beverage

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
33.3 kcal
42.5g
Sugars
0.4g
5g
Fat
1.7g
5g
Protein
3.3g
2.4g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cap’n Crunch’s crunch berries and Organic Soy Unsweetened Non-Dairy Beverage side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cap’n Crunch’s crunch berries is the more energy-dense option here, packing 367 more calories per 100g than Organic Soy Unsweetened Non-Dairy Beverage. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cap’n Crunch’s crunch berries contains significantly more sugar (42.5g) compared to the milder Organic Soy Unsweetened Non-Dairy Beverage (0.417g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Soy Unsweetened Non-Dairy Beverage is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cap’n Crunch’s crunch berries or Organic Soy Unsweetened Non-Dairy Beverage?

It depends on your goals. Cap’n Crunch’s crunch berries has 400 calories, while Organic Soy Unsweetened Non-Dairy Beverage has 33.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cap’n Crunch’s crunch berries vegan?

No, Cap’n Crunch’s crunch berries is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cap’n Crunch’s crunch berries and Organic Soy Unsweetened Non-Dairy Beverage?

There is a difference of 367 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.