Head-to-Head Analysis

Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers vs Jolly Rancher Gummies Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers

Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Jolly Rancher Gummies Original

Jolly Rancher Gummies Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
487 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
12.8g
Sugars
60g
25.6g
Fat
0g
7.7g
Protein
0g
1.7g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers and Jolly Rancher Gummies Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 154 more calories per 100g than Jolly Rancher Gummies Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers takes the lead with only 12.8g of sugar per 100g, whereas Jolly Rancher Gummies Original contains 60g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers offers a protein boost with 7.69g per 100g, outperforming Jolly Rancher Gummies Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers or Jolly Rancher Gummies Original?

It depends on your goals. Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers has 487 calories, while Jolly Rancher Gummies Original has 333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers vegan?

No, Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Captain's Wafers sandwich crackers and Jolly Rancher Gummies Original?

There is a difference of 154 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.