Head-to-Head Analysis

Caramel almond sea salt vs Gluten free oven-ready lasagne pasta

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Caramel almond sea salt

Caramel almond sea salt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Gluten free oven-ready lasagne pasta

Gluten free oven-ready lasagne pasta

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
450 kcal
Energy
358 kcal
15g
Sugars
0g
40g
Fat
1.9g
15g
Protein
7.6g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Caramel almond sea salt and Gluten free oven-ready lasagne pasta side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Caramel almond sea salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 92 more calories per 100g than Gluten free oven-ready lasagne pasta. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Caramel almond sea salt contains significantly more sugar (15g) compared to the milder Gluten free oven-ready lasagne pasta (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Gluten free oven-ready lasagne pasta is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Caramel almond sea salt offers a protein boost with 15g per 100g, outperforming Gluten free oven-ready lasagne pasta in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Caramel almond sea salt or Gluten free oven-ready lasagne pasta?

It depends on your goals. Caramel almond sea salt has 450 calories, while Gluten free oven-ready lasagne pasta has 358 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Caramel almond sea salt vegan?

No, Caramel almond sea salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Caramel almond sea salt and Gluten free oven-ready lasagne pasta?

There is a difference of 92 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.