Head-to-Head Analysis

Caramel choc peanut butter vs Italian Bomba Hot Pepper Sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Caramel choc peanut butter

Caramel choc peanut butter

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Italian Bomba Hot Pepper Sauce

Italian Bomba Hot Pepper Sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
432 kcal
Energy
214 kcal
46.4g
Sugars
0g
17.9g
Fat
21.4g
10.7g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Caramel choc peanut butter and Italian Bomba Hot Pepper Sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Caramel choc peanut butter is the more energy-dense option here, packing 218 more calories per 100g than Italian Bomba Hot Pepper Sauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Caramel choc peanut butter contains significantly more sugar (46.4g) compared to the milder Italian Bomba Hot Pepper Sauce (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Italian Bomba Hot Pepper Sauce is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Caramel choc peanut butter offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Italian Bomba Hot Pepper Sauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Caramel choc peanut butter or Italian Bomba Hot Pepper Sauce?

It depends on your goals. Caramel choc peanut butter has 432 calories, while Italian Bomba Hot Pepper Sauce has 214 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Caramel choc peanut butter vegan?

No, Caramel choc peanut butter is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Caramel choc peanut butter and Italian Bomba Hot Pepper Sauce?

There is a difference of 218 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.