Head-to-Head Analysis

caramel & sea salt 60% COCOA DARK CHOCOLATE vs Triple chocolate snack bar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of caramel & sea salt 60% COCOA DARK CHOCOLATE

caramel & sea salt 60% COCOA DARK CHOCOLATE

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Triple chocolate snack bar

Triple chocolate snack bar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
535.7 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
42.9g
Sugars
0g
32.1g
Fat
22.5g
3.6g
Protein
30g
0.5g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing caramel & sea salt 60% COCOA DARK CHOCOLATE and Triple chocolate snack bar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

caramel & sea salt 60% COCOA DARK CHOCOLATE is the more energy-dense option here, packing 136 more calories per 100g than Triple chocolate snack bar. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. caramel & sea salt 60% COCOA DARK CHOCOLATE contains significantly more sugar (42.8571428571429g) compared to the milder Triple chocolate snack bar (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Triple chocolate snack bar is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: caramel & sea salt 60% COCOA DARK CHOCOLATE or Triple chocolate snack bar?

It depends on your goals. caramel & sea salt 60% COCOA DARK CHOCOLATE has 535.714285714286 calories, while Triple chocolate snack bar has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is caramel & sea salt 60% COCOA DARK CHOCOLATE vegan?

No, caramel & sea salt 60% COCOA DARK CHOCOLATE is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between caramel & sea salt 60% COCOA DARK CHOCOLATE and Triple chocolate snack bar?

There is a difference of 136 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.