Head-to-Head Analysis

Caribenas coconut cookies vs Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Caribenas coconut cookies

Caribenas coconut cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms

Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
481 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
25.9g
Sugars
63.3g
16.7g
Fat
0g
7.4g
Protein
3.3g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Caribenas coconut cookies and Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Caribenas coconut cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 148 more calories per 100g than Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Caribenas coconut cookies takes the lead with only 25.9g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms contains 63.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Caribenas coconut cookies offers a protein boost with 7.41g per 100g, outperforming Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Caribenas coconut cookies or Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms?

It depends on your goals. Caribenas coconut cookies has 481 calories, while Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms has 333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Caribenas coconut cookies vegan?

No, Caribenas coconut cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Caribenas coconut cookies and Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms?

There is a difference of 148 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.