Head-to-Head Analysis

Carne Asada vs KETO 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Coconut Almond Sea Salt Snaps

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Carne Asada

Carne Asada

Not Vegan
VS
Package of KETO 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Coconut Almond Sea Salt Snaps

KETO 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Coconut Almond Sea Salt Snaps

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
196 kcal
Energy
180 kcal
0.9g
Sugars
4g
14.3g
Fat
15g
14.3g
Protein
3g
1.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Carne Asada and KETO 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Coconut Almond Sea Salt Snaps side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Carne Asada is the more energy-dense option here, packing 16 more calories per 100g than KETO 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Coconut Almond Sea Salt Snaps. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Carne Asada takes the lead with only 0.893g of sugar per 100g, whereas KETO 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Coconut Almond Sea Salt Snaps contains 4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Carne Asada offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming KETO 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Coconut Almond Sea Salt Snaps in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Carne Asada or KETO 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Coconut Almond Sea Salt Snaps?

It depends on your goals. Carne Asada has 196 calories, while KETO 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Coconut Almond Sea Salt Snaps has 180 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Carne Asada vegan?

No, Carne Asada is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Carne Asada and KETO 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Coconut Almond Sea Salt Snaps?

There is a difference of 16 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.