Head-to-Head Analysis

Carolina Mustard Style Sweet Mustard BBQ Sauce vs La preferida, tomato sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Carolina Mustard Style Sweet Mustard BBQ Sauce

Carolina Mustard Style Sweet Mustard BBQ Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of La preferida, tomato sauce

La preferida, tomato sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
33 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
3.3g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
1.6g
2.4g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Carolina Mustard Style Sweet Mustard BBQ Sauce and La preferida, tomato sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Carolina Mustard Style Sweet Mustard BBQ Sauce is the more energy-dense option here, packing 110 more calories per 100g than La preferida, tomato sauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Carolina Mustard Style Sweet Mustard BBQ Sauce contains significantly more sugar (28.6g) compared to the milder La preferida, tomato sauce (3.28g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, La preferida, tomato sauce is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Carolina Mustard Style Sweet Mustard BBQ Sauce or La preferida, tomato sauce?

It depends on your goals. Carolina Mustard Style Sweet Mustard BBQ Sauce has 143 calories, while La preferida, tomato sauce has 33 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Carolina Mustard Style Sweet Mustard BBQ Sauce vegan?

No, Carolina Mustard Style Sweet Mustard BBQ Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Carolina Mustard Style Sweet Mustard BBQ Sauce and La preferida, tomato sauce?

There is a difference of 110 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.