Head-to-Head Analysis

Cashew Caramel Clusters vs Sliced California Black Ripe Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cashew Caramel Clusters

Cashew Caramel Clusters

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sliced California Black Ripe Olives

Sliced California Black Ripe Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
438 kcal
Energy
125 kcal
40.6g
Sugars
0g
21.9g
Fat
9.4g
6.3g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
2.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cashew Caramel Clusters and Sliced California Black Ripe Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cashew Caramel Clusters is the more energy-dense option here, packing 313 more calories per 100g than Sliced California Black Ripe Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cashew Caramel Clusters contains significantly more sugar (40.6g) compared to the milder Sliced California Black Ripe Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sliced California Black Ripe Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cashew Caramel Clusters offers a protein boost with 6.25g per 100g, outperforming Sliced California Black Ripe Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cashew Caramel Clusters or Sliced California Black Ripe Olives?

It depends on your goals. Cashew Caramel Clusters has 438 calories, while Sliced California Black Ripe Olives has 125 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cashew Caramel Clusters vegan?

No, Cashew Caramel Clusters is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cashew Caramel Clusters and Sliced California Black Ripe Olives?

There is a difference of 313 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.