Head-to-Head Analysis

Cashews vs Sweet Fish

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Cashews

Cashews

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Fish

Sweet Fish

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
180 kcal
Energy
260 kcal
2g
Sugars
6g
13g
Fat
0g
6g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cashews and Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Cashews is the clear winner. With 80 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Cashews takes the lead with only 2g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Fish contains 6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Cashews offers a protein boost with 6g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Fish in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cashews or Sweet Fish?

Cashews appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Cashews vegan?

No, Cashews is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cashews and Sweet Fish?

There is a difference of 80 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.