Head-to-Head Analysis

Cashews Roasted & Salted vs Sol ti chlorophyll aloe superade

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cashews Roasted & Salted

Cashews Roasted & Salted

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sol ti chlorophyll aloe superade

Sol ti chlorophyll aloe superade

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
556 kcal
Energy
9.1 kcal
5.6g
Sugars
1.8g
50g
Fat
0g
16.7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cashews Roasted & Salted and Sol ti chlorophyll aloe superade side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cashews Roasted & Salted is the more energy-dense option here, packing 547 more calories per 100g than Sol ti chlorophyll aloe superade. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cashews Roasted & Salted contains significantly more sugar (5.56g) compared to the milder Sol ti chlorophyll aloe superade (1.82g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sol ti chlorophyll aloe superade is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cashews Roasted & Salted offers a protein boost with 16.7g per 100g, outperforming Sol ti chlorophyll aloe superade in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cashews Roasted & Salted or Sol ti chlorophyll aloe superade?

It depends on your goals. Cashews Roasted & Salted has 556 calories, while Sol ti chlorophyll aloe superade has 9.09 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cashews Roasted & Salted vegan?

No, Cashews Roasted & Salted is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cashews Roasted & Salted and Sol ti chlorophyll aloe superade?

There is a difference of 547 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.