Head-to-Head Analysis

Cento, flat fillet anchovies vs Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cento, flat fillet anchovies

Cento, flat fillet anchovies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
179 kcal
Energy
137 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
8g
Fat
2.6g
27g
Protein
28.1g
0g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cento, flat fillet anchovies and Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cento, flat fillet anchovies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 42 more calories per 100g than Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cento, flat fillet anchovies or Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans?

It depends on your goals. Cento, flat fillet anchovies has 179 calories, while Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans has 137 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cento, flat fillet anchovies vegan?

No, Cento, flat fillet anchovies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cento, flat fillet anchovies and Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans?

There is a difference of 42 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.