Head-to-Head Analysis

Century Tuna Flakes in Oil vs Extra large pitted california ripe olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Century Tuna Flakes in Oil

Century Tuna Flakes in Oil

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Extra large pitted california ripe olives

Extra large pitted california ripe olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
179 kcal
Energy
107.1 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
12.5g
Fat
10.7g
12.5g
Protein
0g
1.7g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Century Tuna Flakes in Oil and Extra large pitted california ripe olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Century Tuna Flakes in Oil is the more energy-dense option here, packing 72 more calories per 100g than Extra large pitted california ripe olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Century Tuna Flakes in Oil offers a protein boost with 12.5g per 100g, outperforming Extra large pitted california ripe olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Century Tuna Flakes in Oil or Extra large pitted california ripe olives?

It depends on your goals. Century Tuna Flakes in Oil has 179 calories, while Extra large pitted california ripe olives has 107.14 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Century Tuna Flakes in Oil vegan?

No, Century Tuna Flakes in Oil is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Century Tuna Flakes in Oil and Extra large pitted california ripe olives?

There is a difference of 72 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.